<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>John's Blog - Latest Comments in WTFCNN</title><link>http://johnlillyblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:15:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419358</link><description>What about Al Jazeera? I find it presents an honest overview for world news.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tao</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419347</link><description>IHT is very good...http://www.iht.com/</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:38:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419357</link><description>I was also going to suggest BBC.  I guess &lt;a href="http://Topix.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Topix.com&lt;/a&gt; is a little disparate (if that's a word and if I spelled it correctly).  But it's interesting to search by zip code and see all the sources and feeds that pop up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Topix.com's user comments quickly devolve into flame wars, though.  Best avoided.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419356</link><description>Surprisingly, I've been impressed with MSNBC lately. Their clean website helps, but the articles are well written as well and the occasional video is nice too. I'd highly recommend it and that's not something I would've said a year ago.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:59:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419354</link><description>but doesn't it seem strange that there aren't really good answers here?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419353</link><description>NYT is good, and something i track, but not so good with pop culture or sports or tech, really. i'm sorta lowbrow in my pop culture -- maybe i should just start checking &lt;a href="http://ew.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;ew.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419352</link><description>why not nytimes?  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;seems so obvious that you must have a reason...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">npr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419351</link><description>I find it best to go to Europe for my news on the US.  BBC &amp;amp; FT, FTW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I also read my home town rag, the NYT.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 19:56:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419350</link><description>&lt;a href="http://whitesoap.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://whitesoap.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pkim</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:35:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419349</link><description>I first lost faith in CNN during their non-stop coverage of the Jon Benet Ramsey case 8ish years ago. Lewinski fest didn't help either. Back then, I thanked the stars for Google News. Now Goog News is also old somehow...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:43:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WTFCNN</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2008/03/17/wtfcnn/#comment-1419348</link><description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt; ? I use it when I get fed up with CNN. Usually has a non-US bias and some pretty good reporting. BBC also does a good job of providing context and history to most articles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Doherty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:23:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>