<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>John's Blog - Latest Comments in this is supposed to be a good thing?</title><link>http://johnlillyblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:26:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: this is supposed to be a good thing?</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/23/this-is-supposed-to-be-a-good-thing/#comment-4544089</link><description>Is Google building an artificial intelligence system or a better search engine?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryanchow</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:26:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: this is supposed to be a good thing?</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/23/this-is-supposed-to-be-a-good-thing/#comment-1418467</link><description>yay! someone understood my reference! i was thinking it was maybe too esoteric &amp; weird... :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 09:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: this is supposed to be a good thing?</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/23/this-is-supposed-to-be-a-good-thing/#comment-1418466</link><description>Totally not related to the meat of your post, which I tend to agree with, but that's one of my favorite episodes of Sports Night.  That reference draws a distinct picture in my head of what you are feeling right now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A large part of Firefox's success was built on keeping Internet users safe.  What happens when we reach the point where we need to start keeping people safe from Google as well?  That, sir, is going to be a hard day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christopher Blizzard</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 09:33:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: this is supposed to be a good thing?</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/23/this-is-supposed-to-be-a-good-thing/#comment-1418464</link><description>I'm surprised that Schmidt used the words "total information" together. Immaterial of what he meant or was referring to, the last time we were faced with a "total information" program, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Awareness_Office" rel="nofollow"&gt;it didn't go over very well&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Preed</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 01:34:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: this is supposed to be a good thing?</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2007/05/23/this-is-supposed-to-be-a-good-thing/#comment-1418465</link><description>This is particularly freaky given David's &lt;a href="http://blog.opendns.com/2007/05/22/google-turns-the-page/" rel="nofollow"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Messina</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 22:18:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>