<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>John's Blog - Latest Comments in new patent</title><link>http://johnlillyblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://johnlillyblog.disqus.com/new_patent/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:31:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: new patent</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/05/20/new-patent-2/#comment-2029282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;JW... whats the problem with looking at patent information at work?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patents</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:31:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: new patent</title><link>http://john.jubjubs.net/2006/05/20/new-patent-2/#comment-1418002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;fwiw, you might want to put a warning before that link. I clicked it without thinking, and then had a total freakout when I realized I was looking at the text of an actual patent -- on my work machine. we're not supposed to look at patents or do patent research of any kind. that's done by the patent attorneys where I work. (yes, it was dumb of me to look, but I was excited for you and forgot about the policy until I read the first couple words of the abstract.) =:o&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lori</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 14:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>